I conduct experimental research to explore how prosody affects speech perception and the mental representations of phonetic and phonological knowledge. Some themes in my research are:
- Prosody in tonal and non-tonal languages
- L2 prosody: perception, production, and mental representations
- Documenting prosody in understudied languages and populations
- Social, linguistic, and emotional aspects of prosody
You can retrieve abstracts and articles from those links:
1. Prosody in tonal and non-tonal languages
Basic research into prosodic systems. It addresses questions like:
- How are the variations of duration, pitch, and intensity used to express lexical, sentence-level, and pragmatic meanings cross-linguistically?
- How do speakers process prosody and intonation?
- How are stress and accent represented cross-linguistically?
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Nagao, J. (2020). “Right-edge markers, duration, and intensity cues to narrow focus in Japanese .” Poster presented at the Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, December 7-11. Link: https://ave20-asa.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=45-08-B7-A6-49-80-31-D2-08-7F-36-38-AC-58-34-1E
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Olson, D., and Tuninetti, A. (2018). “Explaining cross-language asymmetries in prosodic processing: The Cue-Driven Window Length hypothesis.” Language and Speech 62 (4), pp. 701-736.
Wu,Z. and Ortega-Llebaria, M. (2017). “Pitch shape modulates the time course of tone vs. pitch accent processing in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (3),pp. 2263-2276.
Ortega-Llebaria,M. and Prieto, P. (2011). “Acoustic correlates of stress in Central Catalan and Castilian Spanish.” Language and Speech 54(1),pp. 1-25.
Ortega-Llebaria,M., Prieto, P. and Vanrell, M. (2010). “Catalan speakers’ perception of word stress in unaccented contexts.”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127(1),pp. 462-471.
2. L2 prosody: perception, production, and mental representations
This line of research investigates the role of the native language prosody in a second language, and the prosody of bilingual speakers. It addresses questions such as:
- How do speakers of tonal and non-tonal languages (e.g., Chinese speakers of English) represent pitch in their bilingual lexicons?
- What is the extent of the stress deafness phenomenon?
- What aspects of L2 prosody are the most difficult to learn and why?
Ortega-Llebaria,M., and Wu, Zhaohong, (2020). “Chinese-English Speakers’ Perception of Pitch in Their Non-Tonal Language: Reinterpreting English as a Tonal-Like Language”. Language and Speech, DOI.
Ortega-Llebaria,M.,*Nemoga, M., Presson, N. (2017). “Long-term experience with a tonal language shapes the perception of intonation in English words: How Chinese–English bilinguals perceive “Rose?” vs.“Rose”.”Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, pp. 1-17.
Ortega-Llebaria, M.and Colantoni, L. (2014). “The L2 acquisition of English intonation: form-meaning associations and maintenance of auditory resolution to acoustic cues.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36, pp.331-353.
Ortega-Llebaria, M.,*Hong, G., *Fan, Y. (2013). “English speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception.” Journal of Phonetics 41 (3-4),pp. 186-197.
3. Documenting prosody in understudied languages, dialects, and populations
Ideally, an unbiased understanding of speech perception is based in a representative sample of languages and speakers. This line of research contributes to this goal by documenting the prosody and segmental contrasts of understudied languages and populations
Teran,V. and Ortega-Llebaria,M. (2017). “A description of Tucumán Spanish intonation.” Open Linguistics 3(1), pp. 456-490.
Ortega-Llebaria,M. and Bosch, L. (2015). “Cross-dialectal discrimination in early infancy: A look at prosodic, rhythmic and segmental properties”. In Joaquin Romero and MariaRiera (Eds.), The Phonetics-Phonology Interface. Representations and methodologies.Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. 2015:Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 55-71.
Olson,Daniel and Ortega-Llebaria, M.(2010). “Perceptual relevance of code switching and intonation in creating narrow focus.” In Marta Ortega-Llebaria (Ed.) Selected Proceedings of the 4thConference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Cascadilla Press, Sommerville, MA.,pp. 57-68.
Manolescu,A., Olson, D., Ortega-Llebaria, M.(2009) “Cues to contrastive focus in Romanian.” In M. Vigário, S. Frota and M.J. Freitas. (Eds.). Interactions in Phonetics and Phonology, John Benjamins: Amsterdam/Philadelphia, pp. 71-90.
4. Social, linguistic, and emotional aspects of prosody